I've been hearing some of the same concerns repeatedly in conversations with other wildlife photographers lately.

Those attending art and craft markets are telling me sales are down. Photographers offering wildlife photography tours are finding it harder to fill their seats, particularly when they venture beyond the perennial favourites like Africa and Alaska. And with the rising costs of just about everything, the expenses associated with running a wildlife photography business aren't getting any smaller.

I can certainly relate to some of those concerns.

When you make your living, or even part of your living, from wildlife photography, there is an enormous amount of time, money, and effort invested long before someone purchases a print or books a photography workshop.

And unlike many other businesses, what we're selling is often something people would love to have or experience, but don't necessarily need.

When household budgets are stretched, those purchases can become harder to justify.

So what does that mean for those of us trying to build and sustain a wildlife photography business?

I've been giving this quite a bit of thought, particularly as I consider the various parts of my own business and where I want to invest my time and resources.

And I keep coming back to something I think is especially important when the economy becomes challenging.

When Sales Slow Down, What's Really Changing?

It's tempting to attribute declining sales to the economy, and there may be good reason to do so. People are making difficult decisions about where their money goes, and discretionary purchases are often the first to be reconsidered.

But I think we need to look a little deeper before deciding that people simply aren't buying anymore.

Consider the photographer who has attended the same art market for several years and is now experiencing lower sales.

Are fewer people attending the market? Are visitors still purchasing, but choosing smaller, less expensive items? Are they spending more time looking and less time buying? Or has the market itself changed, perhaps attracting a different audience than it once did?

Those distinctions matter because they point to very different problems. If attendance has fallen significantly, changing your product selection may have little impact. If people are still buying but choosing lower-priced items, there may be opportunities to reconsider your product mix without reducing prices across the board.

And if shoppers are showing genuine interest but not purchasing, it may be worth examining how we're presenting our work, communicating its value, or making the purchasing decision easier.

I also think we need to consider what happens beyond the market itself. Someone who discovers your photography at a market may become a customer months later, sign up for a workshop, or recommend your work to someone else.

That doesn't mean we should justify consistently unprofitable markets on the possibility of future sales. But it does mean the value of attending isn't always captured by the amount of money in the cash box at the end of the weekend.

Why Revenue Doesn't Tell the Whole Story

I operate several different parts of my wildlife photography business, from fine art prints and merchandise to photography tours, education, and mentorship.

And one thing I've learned is that revenue from those different activities isn't equally valuable.

A $2,000 print sale, a $2,000 tour booking, and $2,000 in merchandise sales may look identical on a sales report, but what remains after the associated expenses can be very different.

Even within a single revenue stream, profitability can vary considerably. Take photography markets, for example. I have the costs of producing my inventory, booth fees, travel, accommodations, and sometimes several days away from home. Some products have much stronger margins than others. A market can generate respectable sales but still provide a disappointing return once everything is considered.

Then there's the inventory that doesn't sell. It still has value, of course, and may sell at another market or through my website. But the money invested in producing it is tied up until that happens. And that matters when you're considering how much additional inventory to purchase for the next event.

I don't believe every product or activity needs to deliver the same profit margin. Some products attract new customers, others generate repeat purchases, and some are better suited to building the reputation of our work. But we need to understand those differences. Otherwise, it's surprisingly easy to grow our sales while making very little progress financially.

The Changing Economics of Wildlife Photography Tours

I've been particularly interested in what I'm hearing from photographers who offer wildlife photography tours. There appears to be continued enthusiasm for established destinations like Africa and Alaska, while some photographers are finding it more difficult to attract participants to less familiar locations.

I wouldn't assume this is happening across the entire industry without more evidence, but it raises an interesting question. Are photographers becoming less willing to spend money on travel, or are they becoming more selective about which experiences justify that investment?

I suspect there may be an element of both.

When someone is considering spending several thousand dollars on a wildlife photography experience, the decision involves more than the quality of the photographic opportunities. There is the destination's appeal, confidence in the experience being offered, travel costs, the likelihood of meaningful wildlife encounters, and the competing opportunities for that money. An established destination may have an advantage simply because photographers already understand its appeal. A lesser-known destination might offer equally extraordinary photographic opportunities, but require considerably more effort to communicate why it's worth the investment.

For those of us organizing tours, that creates a business challenge.

We may be excited about introducing photographers to somewhere new, but our enthusiasm for a destination doesn't necessarily translate into sufficient demand. And wildlife photography tours often involve financial commitments long before we know whether the seats will fill. Accommodation deposits, local guides, transportation, permits, and other arrangements can create substantial financial exposure.

What concerns me isn't simply whether a tour will be profitable if every seat sells. It's what happens if registrations are slower than anticipated, one or two seats remain empty, or we need to cancel after making financial commitments. That changes how I think about introducing new tour opportunities. Perhaps it's worth testing interest before securing expensive arrangements. Perhaps we negotiate more flexible payment or cancellation terms. Or perhaps we focus on destinations where we've already demonstrated demand rather than continually adding new ones.

There is another consideration that is easy to overlook.

A tour can be profitable and still be a poor use of our time if it requires months of planning, marketing, and administration for a relatively modest return. And when we're considering the next tour opportunity, that matters just as much as the number of seats we expect to sell.

Is Lowering Our Prices Really the Answer?

When people become more hesitant to spend money, lowering prices can seem like an obvious solution. But I'm not convinced that a lower price always addresses the reason someone isn't purchasing.

If someone loves a photograph but simply doesn't have room for a large fine art print, a discount may not change their decision. A smaller format might be a better option. If a photographer is reluctant to book an expensive tour because they aren't familiar with the destination, reducing the price may do little to resolve their uncertainty about the experience. And if someone genuinely cannot afford a discretionary purchase right now, a modest discount probably isn't going to change that either.

We need to understand whether price is actually the obstacle.

There are also situations where discounting can make financial sense, particularly when we have inventory we want to move or unused capacity that cannot be sold later. An unsold seat on a tour represents an opportunity that disappears once the tour begins. Existing print inventory, on the other hand, may still have value for months or years. Those are very different circumstances, and I wouldn't approach the pricing decisions in the same way.

I also think we need to be careful not to undermine the perceived value of our work through constant promotions.

I've invested considerable time, resources, and experience in creating my images. I want my pricing to reflect that, while still offering products at different price points for people who appreciate my photography. That doesn't mean every customer needs to purchase a large limited-edition print. But it does mean I would rather think carefully about what I offer than assume the solution is to make everything cheaper.

The Hidden Cost of Trying to Do More

When sales aren't meeting our expectations, I think there's a natural tendency to look for additional ways to generate income. Another market. Another workshop. A new merchandise product. An online course. Perhaps another platform where we can sell our photographs.

And there can certainly be value in having several income streams.

It's one of the reasons I've developed different aspects of my own business. People connect with wildlife photography in different ways, and I enjoy being able to share my work and knowledge through prints, workshops, education, and mentorship. But diversification only strengthens a business when those different activities contribute something worthwhile.

Every additional product requires decisions about production, pricing, inventory, marketing, and fulfillment. Every tour requires planning, coordination, communication, and delivery. And every new offering competes for something we all have a limited supply of: time.

I think we sometimes overlook the cumulative effect of those commitments.

A product might generate a reasonable profit on each sale, but if it requires considerable administrative effort and sells infrequently, it may not be worth expanding. A new tour might offer an attractive margin, but if it requires a substantial marketing effort to secure every registration, there may be better opportunities elsewhere in the business. And adding another revenue stream doesn't necessarily protect us from a difficult economy if we're simply adding more expenses and complexity to an already demanding business.

Sometimes improving profitability means doing less, not more. It means being willing to look at activities we've invested time and money in and ask whether they still deserve a place in our business.

That's not always an easy question to answer, particularly when we're personally attached to what we've created.

What Is Our Time Really Worth?

This is something I think many wildlife photographers struggle with, myself included at times.

We love what we do.

I love being out in the field, spending time with wildlife, learning about behaviour, and waiting for those moments that make an image meaningful to me. I would be doing much of that whether I operated a photography business or not.

But there's a difference between pursuing wildlife photography because I love it and making financial decisions about activities intended to generate income. And I think it's important that we recognize that difference.

Consider the time involved in preparing for a market or organizing a tour. The obvious expenses are relatively easy to calculate, but how do we account for the days spent preparing inventory, communicating with clients, researching locations, or managing logistics? If an activity generates a reasonable financial return but requires an extraordinary amount of time, is it really the best opportunity available to us?

That doesn't mean I believe every business decision should be reduced to an hourly rate. Some activities create opportunities that extend well beyond the immediate financial return. A tour may strengthen relationships with photographers who later become repeat clients. A market may introduce my work to people who wouldn't otherwise encounter it.

And some experiences are simply important to me.

But those benefits need to be considered deliberately rather than used to justify every activity that doesn't quite pay for itself. I don't want a business that requires me to be constantly busy simply to remain financially viable.

I want one that supports the photography I love and gives me the flexibility to pursue the experiences that matter to me. And that means being selective about where I spend my time.

Knowing What to Change, and What to Leave Alone

One thing I would caution against is making significant business changes every time sales slow down. A disappointing market doesn't necessarily mean the products aren't right. A tour that takes longer to fill doesn't automatically mean the price is too high. And a few weeks of limited website sales don't tell us much about the longer-term health of a business.

I think we need to be careful not to confuse an individual result with a meaningful pattern. But we also shouldn't ignore evidence simply because we hope things will improve. If several markets are consistently producing lower returns, it's worth examining why. If a tour destination repeatedly struggles to attract bookings, perhaps the demand isn't strong enough to justify continuing. And if we're generating more revenue but finding that very little is left after expenses, then something in the business deserves closer attention.

The challenge is knowing where to look.

I think it's particularly important to examine how the different parts of our businesses affect one another. For example, increasing our merchandise inventory might improve product availability at markets, but it also ties up money that could be used elsewhere. Adding another tour might create additional revenue, but it could take time away from marketing existing tours or developing relationships with mentorship clients.

Even a profitable activity can have consequences for other parts of the business. These are the decisions that become increasingly important when resources are limited. And they're also why I believe we need to look beyond sales figures and understand how the entire business is performing.

Building a Business That Supports the Photography We Love

For all this discussion about profitability, I don't want to lose sight of why many of us started wildlife photography businesses in the first place. It certainly wasn't because we wanted to spend our days analyzing expenses, managing inventory, or evaluating financial risk.

For me, it has always been about wildlife.

The hours spent watching an animal and gradually understanding its behaviour. The anticipation of something about to happen. The quiet moments that reveal a little more about the lives of the animals I photograph. Those are the experiences I want to continue having, and they're the experiences I love sharing with other photographers.

But I've also learned that passion alone doesn't make a business financially sustainable. And in a difficult economy, I think that reality becomes harder to ignore.

We can't control how much money people have available to spend on photography. We can't control rising costs or guarantee that every tour will fill. What we can do is understand our businesses well enough to make thoughtful decisions about pricing, expenses, opportunities, and where we invest our time.

That doesn't necessarily mean pursuing more sales.

Sometimes it means improving the profitability of what we're already doing. Sometimes it means recognizing that an opportunity isn't financially worthwhile, even though it would be wonderful photographically. And sometimes it means having the confidence to stay the course rather than making changes simply because sales have slowed temporarily.

I don't believe there's one right way to build a wildlife photography business. Our goals, circumstances, financial resources, and the lives we want to lead are different. But I do believe we owe it to ourselves to understand whether the businesses we're building are actually supporting those goals. Because ultimately, it isn't how much money comes into our business that determines its success. It's what remains after the costs, the time, and the commitments, and whether that return allows us to keep doing the work we love.

Feel stuck in understanding or growing your own business? 

Learn more about my Business of Wildlife Photography Mentorship Program

Or sign up for my Wildlife Photography Business newsletter